saqr

Work out whether this pays you back.

Not whether it could, in principle, for somebody. The model below runs against your fleet size and vehicle type, nets off what we charge, and will tell you plainly when the answer is no.

Six levers, and which you would really pull

Turn off the ones you know your operation will not do. Most of the dishonesty in this category lives in assuming all six.

60
8600+
What they are

Rigids, reefers and vans across regional work

Plan
Levers you will actually pull
Payback
1.2months

Until the saving has covered the devices. The subscription is already netted off.

Annual spend modelled
2,209,464
Annual saving
320,334
Subscription, per year
44,712
Devices, once
27,600
Year one, net
+248,022
Each year after
+275,622
Model it against your real numbers

SAR, excluding VAT. Diesel at 1.66/litre.

Two ends of it

The same model, at the configuration that works and the one that does not. Both come out of the calculator above.

Worth doing

60 heavy vehicles, all six levers

Annual saving
704,687
Year one, net
+601,175
Payback
1.1 months

Heavy fleets burn enough diesel that a modest percentage is a large number. This is the easy case, and it is why the category sells.

Do not buy it

20 light vehicles, idling only

Annual saving
4,940
Year one, net
−17,420
Payback
never

A small fleet of vans that only intends to chase idling is spending more on the software than the idling was costing. Wait until there is a second reason.

What each lever actually needs

Every one of these has a condition attached, and the condition is usually organisational rather than technical. Software makes the problem visible. Somebody still has to act on it.

The four fuel levers compound rather than add. Summed naively they would read 16% of the fuel bill; charged against what the previous ones leave, they come to 15.1%. The second number is the one the model uses.

What is wrong with this model

Every ROI calculator in this industry is a sales tool. This one is too. Here is where it is weakest, so you can discount it accordingly.

These are not our measurements
They are the conservative end of what operators report. We have not audited your fleet, and any vendor quoting a precise figure before doing so is quoting a brochure.
The levers are not independent
Better routing reduces the distance that driving style then applies to. Adding the percentages together would overstate it, so each lever is charged against what the ones before it left — the fuel levers compound, they do not sum.
Most of it needs somebody to act
Alerts do not cut idling; a policy does. The software makes the problem visible and measurable, which is necessary and not sufficient.
Some fleets should not buy this
A small light-vehicle fleet pulling one lever will not clear the hardware cost inside a year. The model will tell you that if you set it up that way.

Heavy

92,000 km/yr · 34 L/100km · maintenance 18,500/yr

Diesel at 1.66 SAR/litre. Change any of these and the answer moves.

Mixed

54,000 km/yr · 21 L/100km · maintenance 11,200/yr

Diesel at 1.66 SAR/litre. Change any of these and the answer moves.

Light

31,000 km/yr · 12 L/100km · maintenance 5,600/yr

Diesel at 1.66 SAR/litre. Change any of these and the answer moves.

The other outcomes

Bring your fuel invoices See pricing We would rather lose the deal than model it optimistically.